Takenote written diffrent
This post will break up the 15 major steps of writing a novel into bite-sized pieces, organized into three categories - before, during, and after you write your manuscript. That’s why I say one of the most valuable traits is persistence.” You start out writing crap and thinking it’s good stuff, and then gradually you get better at it. As Octavia Butler put it: “You don’t start out writing good stuff.
![takenote written diffrent takenote written diffrent](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ec/95/0e/ec950e0613bde6a7269d6fb4e4dbbbd5.jpg)
It requires good doses of commitment and perseverance. Unlike saddling up on a Schwinn for the first time, however, writing a novel can’t be accomplished in one hot summer’s day.
Takenote written diffrent how to#
I have also pointed out endlessly in Notes themselves that the Notes Technique has a direct connection with Zen, so any and all readings in Zen literature are not without a slight value.Much like learning to ride a bike, the best way to learn how to write a novel is by just doing it. Even this particular statement does not interest anyone very much for some obscure reason. But, again, almost all our Note-readers are just not that serious about all that goes into the Notes Technique. You might also, if you want to look more deeply into the use of language, read Noam Chomsky on what he has said about self-referencing statements. The more you learn to shake your brain ruts with what de Bono calls Lateral Thinking, the more you understand and benefit from the Notes Technique. For this supplemental Notelike reading, I highly recommend the works ofįrom the point of view of cognitive self-improvement, which has good background in cognitive science and cognitive psychology, I would recommend all the books of Edward de Bono you can get your hands on. In addition, there are some modern writers who have written books that also have Notelike affects on their readers. The other books are a little too much just spiritually dead intellect, but Rajneesh goes too far the other direction into emotionally appealing mysticism and touting himself as a Guru. I highly recommend this book to Notes Readers who want to get inside the Heraclitus Approach to boosting human intelligence with something like Notes. Even though he does not always understand a Fragment, he at least raises issues that need raising. Worth a read if you are seriously thoughtful about Heraclitus, which I doubt.Įvaluation: Rajneesh picks out a few Fragments and gives them a long-winded Rajneesh treatment that does bring out some rather good insights that indeed bring Heraclitus partially back to life for us. Still, at least somebody in our contemporary time tried to do something serious about Heraclitus in this 1966-67 winter semester at the University in Freiberg.
![takenote written diffrent takenote written diffrent](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/accounts/106594/images/notesonmindmap.jpg)
Heidegger and Fink show off their impressive command of Classical Greek Language combined with mostly left-brained analytic linear “thinking”. The rest of course are the kind of distracted minds that made Heraclitus “obscure” in the first place.Įvaluation: A reasonable effort on the part of Heidegger and his ex-student, Fink, to penetrate at least some of the intellectual problems contained in the Fragments. Maybe one Notes-reader in a million might actually want to think about Heraclitus. With Jaspers we can begin to actually think a little about Heraclitus. Notes Readers of today who want to look into the Notelike character of the Fragments can try the following books:Įvaluation: Kirk and Raven are mechanical scholars without a clue about the real force of intelligence at work in the Fragments, but at least most of the preserved Fragments are there in reasonable translation of Classical Greek into English to get you started.Įvaluation: Jaspers does a chapter on Heraclitus that does a good summation of some general philosophical implications of terms used by Heraclitus in the Fragments. Popular only among the deeply thoughtful, the Fragments were naturally rejected by the emotional masses, as well as by so-called “practical men of the world”. The Fragments of Heraclitus would “enlighten the few and perplex the many” even in Ancient Greece and later in Italy. His various brain-boggling, difficult to understand, Fragments or famous sayings have always had a function similar to Notes. An argument could easily be made that something like Notes began with the Presocratic Ancient Greek Philosopher, Heraclitus. The very idea of Notes is actually ancient.